• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

McCallister v. McCallister, No. 49D12-1606-DR-19232, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 26, 2018).

July 2, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Although under federal law the court could not order husband to change the beneficiary on his Air Force Survivor Benefit Plan as required by the Marital Settlement Agreement, the trial court can determine the value of the Survivor Benefit Plan and reconsider the distribution of marital assets as an alternative remedy.

State v. Lindauer, No. 87A05-1709-CR-2137, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 20, 2018).

June 25, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May, P. Riley

Criminal Rule 4(C) was created to move cases along and not to create a mechanism to avoid trial. A defendant cannot habitually move to reset the preliminary hearing at which the trial date was to be set and then claim that his right to trial within a year was violated.

Marshall v. State, No. 64A05-1710-CR-2368, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 20, 2018).

June 25, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Because the arresting officer could only testify that the defendant’s vehicle “was going over the posted speed limit”, he did not have specific articulable facts to support his initiation of a traffic stop, and therefore it violated defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights.

Horejs v. Milford, No. 45A03-1709-CT-2173, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 14, 2018).

June 18, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

The wrongful death statute precludes the statutory beneficiary who dies before judgment from recovering wrongful death damages when the statutory beneficiary dies with no heirs.

Brewer v. PACCAR, Inc., No. 55A05-1709-CT-2168,__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 15, 2018).

June 18, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

If a party files a motion to correct error, it should either wait for a ruling on the motion before initiating the process of an appeal, or it should dismiss the motion to correct error.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 133
  • Go to page 134
  • Go to page 135
  • Go to page 136
  • Go to page 137
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 400
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs