• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Haddock v. State, No. 18A-CR-1362, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 29, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

A defendant’s waiver of appellate rights is only valid if the sentence is imposed in accordance with the law; however, if a sentence imposed is illegal, and the defendant does not specifically agree to the sentence, the waiver-of-appeal provision is invalid.

Bradley v. State, No. 87A01-1711-CR-2584, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 30, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Defendant’s convictions for two counts of child molesting were affirmed; however, his other conviction for child molesting and conviction for incest were reversed since it is reasonably possible that the jury found him guilty on those counts for the very same acts that were the bases of his convictions for counts one and two.

Brooks v. State, No. 18A-CR-759, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

While defendant showed obnoxious disrespect for authority, her conviction for resisting law enforcement was reversed because strong, powerful, violent means were not shown to be used to evade a law enforcement official’s rightful exercise of his duties.

Granger v. State, No. 18A-CR-1494, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Marijuana grinder is not drug paraphernalia. Paraphernalia is defined as an instrument or device that is used to put or insert a controlled substance into the body and a grinder can only be used to prepare marijuana for ingestion by another means, such as by a joint, a pipe, or a bong.

In re Adoption of L.G.K., No. 18A-AD-371, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

Trial court properly granted unregistered putative father’s motion for relief from adoption when mother fraudulently claimed that she did not know the identity of child’s father.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 129
  • Go to page 130
  • Go to page 131
  • Go to page 132
  • Go to page 133
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 404
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs