• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Nicholson v. Lee, No.18A-CR-1371, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 14, 2019).

February 18, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Gun owner was shielded from liability for failing to safely store and keep gun when the gun is procured by a crime and then later used to commit another crime.

In re Ma.H, No. 18A-JT-1296, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 18, 2019).

February 18, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May, M. Robb

The requirement that Father admit molesting child to complete sex offender treatment violates Father’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination; the trial court’s reliance on his refusal to so admit as proof that his parental rights should be terminated violates his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process.

Easler v. State, No.18A-CR-1371, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 8, 2019

February 11, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

The trial court properly denied defendant’s request to question a juror after the member divulged information relevant for voir dire. Defendant was convicted by a fair and impartial jury; juror disclosed relevant information voluntarily at her earliest opportunity and then assured the parties that she could still be a juror.

Heckard v. State, No. 18A-CR-1376, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 11, 2019).

February 11, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

The evaluation of whether the continuous crime doctrine applies is distinct from the question of whether the continuous crime doctrine has been violated.

Linares v. El Tacarajo, No. 18A-CT-276, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 8, 2019).

February 11, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, M. Robb

Using the Goodwin foreseeability analysis, an automobile salvage business did not have a duty to a patron of a mobile food truck serving food in its parking lot that exploded and caused injury to the patron.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 122
  • Go to page 123
  • Go to page 124
  • Go to page 125
  • Go to page 126
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 404
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs