A Qualified Settlement Offer must resolve all claims between the parties, including counterclaims, and here, the response to the offer was in substance a counteroffer.
Appeals
Perkins v. Memorial Hospital of South Bend, No. 18A-CT-1340, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 11, 2019).
Employee’s mistaken belief that he was subpoenaed to testify at an unemployment hearing did not warrant an exception to the at-will employment doctrine.
Wilkes v. Celadon Croup, Inc., No. 18A-CT-2011, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 12, 2019)
Summary judgment was reversed because a trucking company did not demonstrate that it owed no duty to properly securing items to be transported by a trucker.
Heraeus Medical, LLC v. Zimmer, Inc., No. 18A-PL-1823, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 15, 2019)
The trial court’s preliminary injunction and legal conclusions are reversed in part because portions of the non-compete and non-solicitation agreement are unclear and overbroad.
Redington v. State, No. 18A-CR-950, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 5, 2019).
When a person petitions for the return of guns confiscated under the Jake Laird “red flag” Law for being a dangerous person, the State must present evidence that the person is dangerous now and, in the future, not that he was dangerous in the past.