• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Appeals

Neal v. State, No. 19A-CR-174, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2019).

August 19, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Trial court must conduct a hearing to determine defendant’s ability to pay public defender fees and medical expenses; must reduce the medical expenses incurred by any amount of co-payment made by inmate and insurance or Medicaid reimbursement expected; and, must state a statutory basis for requiring defendant to pay a public defender fee.

Peele v. State, No. 19A-CR-313, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2019).

August 19, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

The warrantless search of the sock that fell from defendant’s pants containing illegal drugs exceeded the proper scope of a Terry search in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights, and the evidence obtained in the search should not have been admitted at trial.

Laboa v. State, No. 18A-CR-951, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2019).

August 19, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

When a meritorious PCR petition was filed by a pro se petitioner, and neither party moved for summary disposition, the post-conviction court should have either ordered the cause to be submitted by affidavit or held an evidentiary hearing.

Campbell v. Eary, No. 19A-MI-6, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2019).

August 19, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

A grandparent visitation order does not survive the subsequent marriage of the natural parents of a child born out of wedlock.

Hayden v. Franciscan Alliance, Inc., No. 18A-CT-1777, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 19, 2019).

August 19, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

When an employee accessed medical records for non-employment-related reasons in direct violation of a confidentiality agreement, the trial court properly granted employer’s motion for summary judgment on respondeat superior and negligent hiring and retention of the employee.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 105
  • Go to page 106
  • Go to page 107
  • Go to page 108
  • Go to page 109
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 404
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs