• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Smith v. Champion Trucking Co., No. 93A02-0808-EX-701, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 25, 2009)

February 27, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Third party settlement did not bar worker’s compensation benefits where the settlement was obtained before a worker’s compensation award had been resolved, and was in an amount less than the anticipated worker’s compensation benefit.

Kuhn v. State, No. 18A05-0805-PC-257, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 12, 2009)

February 20, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

When pro se post-conviction relief petition raised issues of fact about effective assistance of counsel, the trial court erred when it did not arrange for the petitioner’s participation in the hearing on the issues.

St. Clair v. State, No. 76S03-0805-CR-215, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Feb. 17, 2009)

February 20, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme

Plea agreement for state to “recommend” a fixed sentence was not an “open” plea leaving the trial court with discretion on sentence.

Dunn v. State, No. 20A03-0807-CR-362, __N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 18, 2009)

February 20, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Statutory consecutive sentence limitations applicable only to felonies did not preclude sentence that three one year misdemeanors sentences be consecutive.

Pelley v. State, No. 71S05-0808-CR-446, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Feb. 19, 2009)

February 20, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Supreme, T. Boehm

Criminal Rule 4(C)’s one-year limitation does not include the time during which trial proceedings have been stayed pending interlocutory appeal. Appointment of a special prosecutor was not required under an appearance of impropriety standard when circumstances indicated regular prosecutor had no actual conflict.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 584
  • Go to page 585
  • Go to page 586
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to page 588
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 592
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs