• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Brown v. State, No. 34A05-0812-CR-716, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 12, 2009)

June 16, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, J. Baker, J. Kirsch

Plurality agrees defendant receives no sentence credit for period he was arrested on charges unrelated to the one he pled guilty to and which were dismissed; plurality agrees defendant receives credit from time he was arrested on charge he pled guilty to.

Dowdell v. City of Jeffersonville, No. 10A04-0811-CV-676, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 9, 2009)

June 16, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, T. Crone

Jeffersonville ordinance that prohibited convicted sex offenders from entering public parks was unconstitutional as applied under the prohibition on ex post facto laws in the Indiana Constitution.

Montejo v. Arizona, No. 07-1529, __ U.S. __ (May 26, 2009)

June 5, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Scalia, S. Breyer, SCOTUS

Overrules Michigan v. Jackson holding that once a suspect has claimed the Sixth Amendment right to a lawyer, any later waiver of that right during police questioning would be invalid, unless the suspect initiates communication with the officers.

Meredith v. State, No. 89S04-0808-CR-430, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., May 28, 2009)

June 5, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, R. Rucker, Supreme

Placement of a temporary license plate inside a vehicle’s back window is an infraction, justifying a traffic stop.

Stanley v. Walker, No. 41S01-0810-CV-539, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. May 27, 2009)

June 5, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, F. Sullivan, Supreme, T. Boehm

In a personal injury case where the amount of medical expenses actually paid by plaintiff was discounted from the amount originally billed because of arrangements between plaintiff’s health insurance company and medical providers, to the extent that discounted amount may be introduced without referencing insurance, it may be used to determine the reasonable value of medical services.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 573
  • Go to page 574
  • Go to page 575
  • Go to page 576
  • Go to page 577
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 594
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs