• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Alvey v. State, No. 82S01-0902-CR-66, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Aug. 24, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme, T. Boehm

A defendant whose motion to suppress is denied cannot plead guilty and then appeal the denial of his motion, even if his plea agreement provides for it.

Walker v. Nelson, No. 49A05-0903-CV-138, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, T. Crone

When limiting former custodial parent’s parenting time, trial court erred by not making a specific finding that visitation would endanger child’s physical health or well-being or significantly impair his emotional development.

In re Paternity of J.J., No. 08A02-0903-JV-280, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 25, 2009

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Trial court abused its discretion when it modified custody because of Mother’s relocation without considering all of the factors required by Indiana Code section 31-17-2.2-1(b).

Kimbrough v. State, No. 20A03-0901-CR-29, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 13, 2009)

August 14, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Determinations of defendant’s ability to pay fines, court costs, and public defender fund reimbursement were not required at sentencing when the payments were deferred until post-sentence events. When victim had obtained a civil judgment against defendant prior to sentencing, trial court might have to adjust restitution order to avoid double recovery for victim.

Elrod v. Brooks, No. 10A01-0903-CV-155, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 29, 2009)

August 14, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Small claims court abused its discretion when it denied plaintiff the opportunity to present evidence refuting defendant’s counterclaim after defendant presented his evidence.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 557
  • Go to page 558
  • Go to page 559
  • Go to page 560
  • Go to page 561
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs