• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Florida v. Powell, No. 08–1175, __ U.S. __ (Feb. 23, 2010)

February 26, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Ginsburg, S. Breyer, SCOTUS

Advice that a suspect has “the right to talk to a lawyer before answering any of [the law enforcement officers’] questions,” and that he can invoke this right “at any time. . . during th[e] interview,” satisfies Miranda requirement of advice of suspect’s right to have a lawyer with him during interrogation.

Griffin v. State, No. 71S03-0907-CR-333, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Feb. 23, 2010)

February 26, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Addresses the meaning of “briefly” in the drug crime enhancement “defense” that defendant was only “briefly” within one thousand feet of a school, park, etc..

Maryland v. Shatzer, No. 08–680, __ U.S. __ (Feb. 24, 2010)

February 26, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Scalia, C. Thomas, J. Stevens, SCOTUS

Adopts a brightline rule that a fourteen-day break in Miranda custody ends the presumption of involuntariness established in Edwards v. Arizona for responses to police-initiated questioning after a subject has invoked the right to have Miranda counsel present during interrogation; a subject incarcerated for an unrelated crime is not in Miranda custody for purposes of this fourteen-day rule.

In re Adoption of L.D., No. 49A02-0907-CV-671, __ N.E.2d. __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 25, 2010)

February 26, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Since paternal grandparents adopting their grandchild were adoptive rather than biological grandparents, the maternal grandparent was not eligible for visitation under the Grandparent Visitation Act.

Hampton v. State, No. 49A04-0906-CR-331, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 8, 2010)

February 19, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Statute providing that the first thirty years of an A felony child molesting sentence may not be suspended does not operate to change the minimum sentence for such an offense from twenty years to thirty.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 542
  • Go to page 543
  • Go to page 544
  • Go to page 545
  • Go to page 546
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs