U.S. Supreme Court’s Melendez-Diaz holding does not require a change from prior Court of Appeals opinions that Dept. of Toxicology breathalyzer test certificate is not “testimonial” and hence is admissible without testimony from the tester.
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Jarrells, No. 29S02-0908-CV-378, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 27, 2010)
In future trials where the trier of fact finds that the evidence establishes that the plaintiff has received payment for some of the damages from collateral sources, the award should include those damages, but only to the extent that the evidence establishes an obligation to repay.
Gonzalez v. State, No. 82S01-0909-CR-408, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., May 20, 2010)
“[A] defendant’s statements made to a victim or to the court in an effort to gain acceptance of a plea agreement by the court are statements in connection with a plea agreement and therefore are not admissible in evidence pursuant to Evidence Rule 410.”
Wiggins v. State, No. 45A03-0912-CR-613, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 24, 2010)
Prisoner’s ex post facto challenge to sex offender registration should be brought under new statutory procedure in IC 11-8-8-22.
Davidson v. State, No. 49S02-1001-CR-41, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., May 25, 2010)
Appellate Rule 7 sentence review encompasses the totality of the sentence, including suspended periods and other alternative sentencing components.