• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Wiggins v. State, No. 45A03-0912-CR-613, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 24, 2010)

May 28, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Prisoner’s ex post facto challenge to sex offender registration should be brought under new statutory procedure in IC 11-8-8-22.

Davidson v. State, No. 49S02-1001-CR-41, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., May 25, 2010)

May 28, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Appellate Rule 7 sentence review encompasses the totality of the sentence, including suspended periods and other alternative sentencing components.

Indiana Family & Social Servs. Admin. v. Meyer, No. 69S01-0905-CV-233, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 25, 2010)

May 28, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme, T. Boehm

A trial court has no authority to grant an extension of time to file the record in a petition for review of an administrative agency action under the Indiana Administrative Orders and Procedures Act if the record is not filed within the required statutory period or any authorized extension of this period.

Reiswerg v. Statom, No. 49S02-0906-CV-280, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 6, 2010)

May 14, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme, T. Boehm

A party does not waive an affirmative defense by failing to raise it in response to a motion for partial summary judgment that would not be dispositive as to the issue of liability.

Buchanan v. Vowell, No. 49A02-0909-CV-873, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 12, 2010)

May 14, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, B. Barteau, N. Vaidik

Where drunk driver injured plaintiff-pedestrian while driver was speaking on her cell phone with defendant (who was following driver in another car), trial court erred in dismissing plaintiff’s complaint alleging that defendant gratuitously undertook a duty to protect plaintiff from the driver and that defendant was acting in concert with the driver.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 533
  • Go to page 534
  • Go to page 535
  • Go to page 536
  • Go to page 537
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 589
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs