• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Reiswerg v. Statom, No. 49S02-0906-CV-280, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 6, 2010)

May 14, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme, T. Boehm

A party does not waive an affirmative defense by failing to raise it in response to a motion for partial summary judgment that would not be dispositive as to the issue of liability.

Buchanan v. Vowell, No. 49A02-0909-CV-873, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 12, 2010)

May 14, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, B. Barteau, N. Vaidik

Where drunk driver injured plaintiff-pedestrian while driver was speaking on her cell phone with defendant (who was following driver in another car), trial court erred in dismissing plaintiff’s complaint alleging that defendant gratuitously undertook a duty to protect plaintiff from the driver and that defendant was acting in concert with the driver.

Storie v. Randy's Auto Sales, No. 94S00-0912-CQ-559, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 13, 2010)

May 14, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

An entity that purchases and later sells a wrecked vehicle is required to apply for a salvage title under Ind. Code § 9-22-3-11(e) when it no longer owns the vehicle upon receipt of the certificate of title.

Buss v. Harris, No. 52A02-0911-CV-1088, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 17, 2010)

May 14, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Where defendant was not determined to be a sexually violent predator at sentencing, the Department of Correction could not later make that determination. Thus, the trial court properly declined to require the defendant to register as a sexually violent predator for life.

Merchant v. State, No. 02A05-0910-CR-610, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 5, 2010)

May 7, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Uncuffed driver with second officer five feet from driver’s side door while first officer was standing by the open driver’s door was “unsecured and within reaching distance of the passenger compartment” so that warrantless search of compartment was permissible under Arizona v. Gant.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 532
  • Go to page 533
  • Go to page 534
  • Go to page 535
  • Go to page 536
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs