• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Spangler v. Bechtel, No. 49A05-0908-CV-482, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 27, 2010)

July 30, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Mother who suffered a stillbirth due to medical malpractice qualified as an injured patient and satisfied the actual victim requirement under the Medical Malpractice Act regardless of whether the malpractice resulted in injuries to the mother, the fetus, or both, and Parents may assert a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress under the modified impact rule.

Adoption of H.W., No. 71A03-0911-CV-516, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 28, 2010)

July 30, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Trial court had the ability to consider simultaneously both the CHINS action and the Foster Parents’ petition to adopt Child; trial court erred, however, when it determined that DCS’s withholding of consent to the adoption was not in Child’s best interest.

Williams v. State, No. 18A02-0911-CR-1092, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 16, 2010)

July 23, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

When two controlled substance possession counts alleged possession of different commercial drugs, Vicodin and Anexsia, when each drug contained the same controlled substance, dihydrocodeinon, there could be only one conviction of possession of a controlled substance.

Vest v. State, No. 49A02-0912-CR-1276, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 21, 2010)

July 23, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Resisting efforts of several police officers to make an arrest was a single offense, not three, of resisting law enforcement, so that there was no need for a “unanimity” instruction requiring jurors to agree that a particular officer’s efforts were resisted.

Donald v. State, No. 23A04-0912-CR-685, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 22, 2010)

July 23, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Due Process requires that a probationer be competent at his probation revocation hearing.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 521
  • Go to page 522
  • Go to page 523
  • Go to page 524
  • Go to page 525
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 586
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs