• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Hematology-Oncology of Indiana v. Fruits, No. 49A05-0910-CV-556, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 18, 2010)

August 20, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Attorney fees, costs, and expenses are recoverable damages under the Wrongful Death Act and the Adult Wrongful Death Act. NOTE: This opinion conflicts with McCabe v. Commissioner, Ind. Dep’t of Ins., reported in the July 23, 2010 issue of Case Clips.

Bauer v. Shepard, No. 09-2963, ___ F.3d ___ (7th Cir., Aug. 20, 2010)

August 20, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: 7th Circuit, F. Easterbrook

The challenge to the 2008 version of the Code of Judicial Conduct is unripe, not moot.

Curtis v. State, No. 49A02-0911-CR-1106, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 5, 2010)

August 16, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Where it is undisputed that defendant will never recover from his mental illness and will never become competent to stand trial, it was a violation of due process to deny his motion to dismiss the criminal charges pending against him.

State v. Brunner, No. 57A04-1003-CR-121, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 6, 2010)

August 16, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Indiana Code § 35-50-2-7(b) did not authorize the trial court to grant Defendant’s request – nine years after the trial court’s entry of judgment – to reduce his Class D felony conviction to a Class A misdemeanor.

Wilson v. State, No. 49A02-1001-CR-60, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 10, 2010)

August 16, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

(1) Because State’s request to amend the charging information the day before trial was made under the amended version of Ind. Code § 35-34-1-5, Defendant’s failure to request a continuance to prepare his defense resulted in a waiver of the issue for appellate review; (2) although trial court should have redacted unrelated character evidence from Defendant’s BMV record, Defendant failed to prove that the admission of the evidence made a fair trial impossible.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 518
  • Go to page 519
  • Go to page 520
  • Go to page 521
  • Go to page 522
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 586
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs