Use of the crime concealment exception to the statute of limitations requires the State to allege in its charge facts which would establish concealment.
Bunch v. State, No. 49A04-1002-CR-120, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 17, 2010)
Successive confinement of the victim in different places in her home during a burglary/robbery was a single episode of confinement, so that Indiana Double Jeopardy prohibited separate confinement convictions for the confinements in different rooms.
K. L. v. M. H., No. 41A01-1003-JP-145, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 15, 2010)
Trial court did not err in appointing parenting time coordinator sua sponte when parties did not object and record was undisputed parents could not cooperate enough to independently implement parenting time schedule.
Booher v. Sheeram, LLC d/b/a Hampton Inn of Elkhart, No. 20A03-1005-CT-338, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 15, 2010)
Counsel must file a formal request for an extension of time to respond to a motion for summary judgment, even if opposing counsel has informally agreed to an extension.
Holmes v. Celadon Trucking Servs. of Ind., Inc., No. 49A02-1007-PL-714, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 15, 2010)
An action commences when the initiating party files the original and necessary copies of the complaint, the prescribed filing fee, and the original and necessary copies of the summons. Delayed filing of an appearance has no impact on the commencement of the action for statute of limitations purposes.