• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Haynes v. State, No. 27A02-1003-CR-311, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 8, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Officer who witnessed what appeared to be a parking infraction, but could not investigate further to issue a citation before the vehicle drove off, properly stopped the vehicle to issue the complaint and summons.

Akard v. State, No. 79S02-1009-CR-478, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 9, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

An appellate review increase in defendant’s sentence, while within an appellate court’s authority under Appellate Rule 7(B), is not ordered in this case, particularly since the State agreed that the sentence the trial judge imposed was appropriate.

Marion County Auditor v. Saw Mill Creek, LLC, No. 49A02-0912-CV-1192, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 3, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Statutory requirement that auditor send a first-class mail notice of tax due to property owner when initial certified mail notice is returned undelivered must be complied with to comport with due process.

Rider v. McCamment, No. 16A01-1004-CT-180, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 6, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, P. Riley

When home-buyer was by agreement not to be on home construction premises without permission, fact home-buyer had been on the premises numerous times and may have been seen then by contractor precluded summary judgment against home-buyer on her negligence claim for injuries suffered when she was on the construction site.

Brindle v. Arata, No. 02A05-1004-SC-239, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 7, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Student loan funds, exempt from garnishment under federal statute, retain their exempt status after deposit in the student’s bank account.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 501
  • Go to page 502
  • Go to page 503
  • Go to page 504
  • Go to page 505
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 586
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs