• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

State v. West, No. 45A03-1003-PC-213, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 20, 2010)

December 28, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

When the trial transcript was not completed by the date of the P-C.R. hearing, the P-C.R. court did not err in admitting the “then-unavailable transcript” into evidence, with the consent of State and the petitioner, at the hearing in anticipation of its being admitted after completion.

Galloway v. State, No. 33S01-1004-CR-163, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 22, 2010)

December 28, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: F. Sullivan, R. Shepard, Supreme

Reverses bench trial rejection of insanity defense because, despite “nonconflicting expert and lay opinion that defendant . . .was insane, the trial court rejected the insanity defense after concluding that the defendant could continue to be a danger to society because of an inadequate State mental health system.”

Belmares-Bautista v. State, No. 57A04-1003-CR-223, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 22, 2010)

December 28, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Boehm

When defendant made no claim that Spanish language documents he read erroneously translated a standard advisement of the right to counsel or that he did not understand the advice, he failed to show his waiver of counsel was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent.

Jones v. State, No. 32A04-1004-CR-309, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 27, 2010)

December 28, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Reverses order for $1322.60 jury fee, as statute authorizes no more than $2 as a jury fee. Remands for ability to pay determination as required by statute for order requiring payment of $4527 appointed counsel fee and $164 docket fee.

In re M.F., No. 21A04-1002-JP-84, ___ N.E.2d ____ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 27, 2010)

December 28, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander, T. Crone

Sperm Donor Agreements may be valid if they meet criteria beyond the traditional elements of a contract; a physician must be involved in the insemination and the written instrument memorializing the arrangement must be sufficiently thorough and formalized. When parties enter into a facially valid donor agreement contract, the party seeking to avoid the contract has the burden of proof on matters of avoidance.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 498
  • Go to page 499
  • Go to page 500
  • Go to page 501
  • Go to page 502
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 586
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs