• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Sneed v. State, No. 16A01-1010-CR-544, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 25, 2011)

April 29, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Limiting bail to full cash deposit only, when trial court did not articulate any reasons for not allowing the surety bond defendant requested, and when record did not indicate defendant was a flight risk, was an abuse of discretion.

Serrano v. State, No. 02S03-1104-CV-241, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Apr. 27, 2011)

April 29, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme

Civil forfeiture evidence failed to establish by the required preponderance that the truck subject to the action had been used in furtherance of the driver’s drug possession or for the purpose of drug possession.

Brown v. State, No. 49A02-1008-CR-905, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 27, 2011)

April 29, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

The 2010 amendment providing credit time for persons on electronic home monitoring as a direct commitment to community corrections does not apply retroactively.

Beeler v. State, No. 49A05-1007-CR-456, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 27, 2011)

April 29, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, T. Crone

The transcript contained no admissions by the probationer of the alleged probation violation, and without such admissions the revocation without a hearing would be fundamental error, but as there was a notation in the CCS that an admission was made and this notation was presumptively true, the probationer failed to demonstrate fundamental error.

Love v. Rehfus, No. 30S01-1004-CV-162, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., April 21, 2011)

April 29, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme

A firefighter’s private email supporting a political candidate running for township trustee to a small group of citizens was protected public-employee speech under the Garcetti-Connick-Pickering test, and the fire chief was not justified in treating the firefighter differently from any other member of the general public and terminating his position.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 497
  • Go to page 498
  • Go to page 499
  • Go to page 500
  • Go to page 501
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 596
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs