• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Hamilton v. State, No. 49S02-1110-CR-621, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Oct. 19, 2011).

October 21, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, R. Shepard, Supreme

Defendant’s A felony child molesting sentence is revised from the fifty year maximum to thirty-five years.

Brock v. State, No. 38S02-1101-CR-8, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Oct. 18, 2011).

October 21, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme

Defendant had no opportunity to object to the court’s declaration of a mistrial and accordingly cannot be said to have consented to it by failure to timely object, but the repeated improper comments by defense counsel in trial warranted the trial court’s declaration of a mistrial without defense consent, under the manifest necessity standard.

Weinberg v. Boyer, No. 45A03-1011-CT-598, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 19, 2011).

October 20, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

In a medical malpractice suit, patient abandonment is part of the underlying medical malpractice and should be evaluated in light of the medical malpractice suit’s standard of care.

Citimortgage, Inc. v. Barabas, No. 48A04-1004-CC-232, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 20, 2011).

October 20, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, P. Riley

The correct interpretation of Ind. Code § 32-29-8-3 is that the one-year redemption period begins after the sale of the property.

Johnson v. Jacobs, No. 47A01-1102-CT-35, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 20, 2011).

October 20, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Father’s intentional criminal actions of killing his daughter and himself trigger the intervening, superseding cause doctrine, and broke the causal chain between the defendant’s alleged negligence and the daughter’s death; none of the actions or inaction of any of the defendants could be considered a proximate cause of the daughter’s death as a matter of law.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 474
  • Go to page 475
  • Go to page 476
  • Go to page 477
  • Go to page 478
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 595
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs