• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Snyder v. King, No. 94S00-1101-CQ-5, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Dec. 15, 2011).

December 21, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme

Misdemeanor battery is not an “infamous crime” for the purpose of Article II, § 8, of the Indiana Constitution, which authorizes the General Assembly to disenfranchise “any person convicted of an infamous crime”; additionally, the General Assembly has separate constitutional authority to cancel the registration of any person incarcerated following conviction, for the duration of incarceration.

Spangler v. Bechtel, No. 49S05-1012-CV-70, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Dec. 13, 2011).

December 15, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

“[P]arents’ separate actions seeking damages for emotional distress from experiencing the
stillbirth of their child are not barred by the Indiana Child Wrongful Death Act or the Indiana
Medical Malpractice Act.”

Clark v. State, No. 48A04-1104-CR-249, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 5, 2011).

December 8, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

When probation is transferred to another county, the forty-five day filing deadline for a revocation in I.C. 35-38-2-3(a)(2)(B) begins when the receiving court with supervisory authority has notice of the violation, and not when the sentencing court first learns of the violation.

Jones v. State, No. 34A05-1101-CR-66, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 5, 2011).

December 8, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Police substantially complied with statute on destruction of hazardous chemicals so that photographs and other evidence of the chemicals was properly admitted at trial.

A.A.Q. v. State, No. 71A03-1105-JV-239, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 6, 2011).

December 8, 2011 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Consultation by alleged delinquent and parents with public defender prior to initial hearing supports conclusion the waiver of counsel at that hearing was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 469
  • Go to page 470
  • Go to page 471
  • Go to page 472
  • Go to page 473
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 596
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs