• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

In re Civil Commitment of C.P., No. 22A-MH-2960, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 14, 2023).

September 18, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

The collateral consequences that accompany order of involuntary civil commitment make appeal from that order not moot even though the term of commitment has expired.

Englehardt v. State, No. 22A-CR-1760, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 6, 2023).

September 11, 2023 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, D. Kenworthy, M. Bailey, T. Crone

A mistrial is an extreme remedy that is warranted only when no other curative action can be expected to remedy the situation.

McConnell v. Doan, No. 23A-CT-145, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 29, 2023).

September 5, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

The trial court properly appointed a special master pursuant to Indiana Commercial Court Rule 5 and T.R. 70 to take the necessary steps to satisfy a party’s contractual obligations.

Budimir v. State, No. 23A-CR-17, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 23, 2023).

August 28, 2023 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

It is a violation of Article 1, section 11 of the Indiana Constitution for an officer who subsequently arrives on scene to detain, and search an individual, without any additional evidence of suspicion, after that individual was released by an officer who was previously on scene.

Kirby v. State, No. 22A-CR-2971, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 17, 2023).

August 21, 2023 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

While the silent witness theory’s foundation requirements are applicable when a video is admitted into evidence, the requirements also applicable when: (1) witnesses testified regarding the substance of a video; (2) the video recorded events that the witnesses themselves did not observe first-hand; and (3) the video was not offered into evidence.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 43
  • Go to page 44
  • Go to page 45
  • Go to page 46
  • Go to page 47
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 594
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs