• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Southern Union Co. v. United States, No. 11–94, __U.S.__ (June 21, 2012).

June 22, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: S. Breyer, S. Sotomayor, SCOTUS

Apprendi v. New Jersey requires a jury resolution of facts on which imposition of a criminal fine rests.

Sexton v. State, No. 02A03-1110-CR-465, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 11, 2012).

June 14, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, R. Shepard

When the plea bargain called for dismissal of a felon in possession of a handgun charge, “it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to consider the fact that Sexton shot his victim using a handgun it was illegal for a person with five felony convictions to possess.”

Baker v. State, No. 89S01-1109-CR-543, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 12, 2012).

June 14, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Evidence that defendant, who broke and entered, had opened cupboards and drawers was sufficient to support an inference that the defendant was looking for something to take and consequently had intended to commit theft when he broke and entered.

Sexton v. Sexton, No. 34A02-1111-DR-01059, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 8, 2012).

June 14, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Public Law 111-2012 will modify the presumptive age for termination of child support, but it will not alter a child’s ability to obtain educational support except for amending the time frame in which certain children may seek educational support.

Horner v. Carter, No. 34A02-1111-DR-1029, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 13, 2012).

June 14, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

“Alternative Dispute Resolution Rule 2.11 and Indiana Evidence Rule 408 allow the introduction of mediation communications to establish traditional contract defenses.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 443
  • Go to page 444
  • Go to page 445
  • Go to page 446
  • Go to page 447
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 589
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs