• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Jennings v. State, No. 53S01-1209-CR-526 (Ind., Sept. 18, 2012).

September 21, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

The Supreme Court has granted transfer in the misdemeanor sentencing case Jennings v. State, thereby vacating the Court of Appeals opinions found at 956 N.E.2d 203 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011), on rehearing 962 N.E.2d 1260 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012).

State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. Kern, No. 49A02-1201-CT-34, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 20, 2012).

September 21, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

“When an insurer compensates its insured due to a third party tortfeasor being underinsured, the third party tortfeasor’s liability is not reduced.”

State v. Bisard, No. 49A04-1109-CR-459, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 12, 2012).

September 17, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, R. Shepard

Under the Implied Consent statutes, “blood may be drawn at a licensed hospital or by certain people if not at a licensed hospital. To the extent that someone else draws blood, the evidence must show that the person is properly trained and performed the draw in a medically acceptable manner.”

Clarke v. State, No. 49A02-1202-PC-65, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 14, 2012).

September 17, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Defendant’s circumstances, including the fact he had two children born in the United States after his guilty plea, did not suffice to support his claim that he would not have pled guilty had he received advice about deportation consequences from trial counsel.

Pac-Van, Inc. v. Wekiva Falls Resort, No. 49A02-1204-CT-337, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 11, 2012).

September 17, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Shepard

When the losing party pays a judgment in full, post-judgment interest does not keep running on the whole amount until the trial court calculates the amount due for the period between the judgment and the payment.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 431
  • Go to page 432
  • Go to page 433
  • Go to page 434
  • Go to page 435
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs