• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Erwin v. HSBC Mortgage Svcs., Inc., No. 32A01-1202-CT-80, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 15, 2013).

January 17, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Property mortgagor and property managers owed no duty to a girl who drowned in the pool of an abandoned house.

Plank v. Community Hospitals of Ind., Inc., No. 49S04-1203-CT-135,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Jan. 15, 2013).

January 17, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Plaintiff forfeited his opportunity to conduct an evidentiary hearing challenging the constitutionality of the Medical Malpractice Act when he asked for the hearing 6 years into the case, post-verdict.

Gonzalez v. State, No. 45S03-1206-CR-307, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Jan. 10, 2013).

January 10, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Retroactive imposition of a lifetime sex offender registration requirement, when the offender has no remedy for relief from registration on the bases of rehabilitation and no risk to the public, violates the Indiana Constitution Ex Post Facto Clause.

Tipton v. State, No. 47A01-1201-CR-4, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 21, 2012).

December 31, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

For purposes of Class C felony criminal recklessness shooting a firearm into an “inhabited dwelling,” a dwelling is “inhabited” “if someone is likely to be inside,” even if it is shown that in fact no one was inside at the time of the shooting.

Austin v. State, No. 20A03-1112-CR-588, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 21, 2012).

December 31, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Trial court properly found that defendant could not be tried on the seventieth day under his Criminal Rule 4(B) motion when there was a contested child support hearing scheduled for that day and the continuance of the defendant’s earlier scheduled trial date did not leave time for summoning jurors or for state witness subpoenas.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 422
  • Go to page 423
  • Go to page 424
  • Go to page 425
  • Go to page 426
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs