• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

In re A.M.-K., No. 49A02-1207-JC-533,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 20, 2013).

February 21, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

DCS failed to present sufficient evidence to overcome mother’s liberty interest in deciding her own treatment when mother objected to a parental participation order requiring her to take all medications as prescribed.

In re Cook, No. 49A04-1207-PO-370, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 20, 2013).

February 21, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Defendant is entitled to a hearing about whether his name should be removed from the protection order registry on the JTAC website and law enforcement databases, but the Court of Appeals will not remove his name sua sponte.

State Farm Fire & Casualty, Co. v. Riddell Nat’l Bank, No. 61A01-1204-PL-159,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 20, 2013).

February 21, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Ind. Code 27-1-13-17 provides that an insurance policy requiring that the filing of a claim in a time period less than two years is void.

Jones v. State, No. 49A02-1204-CR-292, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 11, 2013).

February 14, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, N. Vaidik

Holds that recent U.S. Supreme Court Confrontation Clause decisions do not alter the result in the earlier Indiana holding that breath test equipment certificates of inspection are not “testimonial” and accordingly are admissible without implicating the Confrontation Clause.

Gray v. State, No. 49A02-1205-CR-352, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 11, 2013).

February 14, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Trial judge erred by not allowing defendant to play portion of deposition audiotape in which witness made a statement inconsistent with the witness’s trial testimony.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 418
  • Go to page 419
  • Go to page 420
  • Go to page 421
  • Go to page 422
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs