• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Robinson v. State, No. 20A04-1209-CR-561, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 23, 2013).

April 25, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Brief contact twice with the fog line on a curvy road at night did not confer reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop.

Keck v. State, , __N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 24, 2013).

April 25, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Affirms trial judge’s conclusion that poor county road conditions made driving left-of-center necessary so that officer did not have a reasonable suspicion for stopping motorist driving on the left.

Meehan v. State, No. 71A04-1209-CR-453, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 25, 2013).

April 25, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Presence of defendant’s DNA on an object at the crime scene, standing alone, was insufficient to prove he committed the offense.

Guzman v. State, No. 54A01-1209-CR-409, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 15, 2013).

April 19, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

When defendant pled guilty to reckless homicide based on death of the driver of the vehicle defendant crashed into, the deceased driver’s passenger was a “victim” for whom trial court properly ordered restitution payment of medical expenses.

Missouri v. McNeely, No. 11–1425, __U.S. __ (April 17, 2013).

April 19, 2013 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: A. Kennedy, C. Thomas, J. Roberts, S. Sotomayor, SCOTUS

Rejects argument that “the natural metabolization of alcohol in the bloodstream presents a per se exigency that justifies an exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement for nonconsensual blood testing in all drunk-driving cases,” and holds instead “that exigency in this context must be determined case by case based on the totality of the circumstances.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 411
  • Go to page 412
  • Go to page 413
  • Go to page 414
  • Go to page 415
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs