When an insurance company includes an explicit exclusion in its policy to cover loss resulting from an intentional act by a co-insured, an “innocent co-insured spouse” is barred from recovery.
Ryan v. Janovsky, No. 45A03-1304-DR-145, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 5, 2013).
Proposed Qualified Domestic Relations Order (“QDRO”) presented for signature over twenty years after the entry of the settlement agreement was not time-barred.
Kelly v. State, No. 30S01-1303-CR-220 , __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Nov. 21, 2013).
Reverses motion to suppress evidence found in a search of defendant’s vehicle and inculpatory statements that defendant made to police.
Leedy v. State, No. 49A04-1303-CR-102, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 26, 2013).
Trial court properly found defendant with brain injury incompetent and committed him to the Division of Mental Health and Addiction (“DMHA”) pursuant to Ind. Code § 35-36-3-1.
Fulp v. Gilliland, No. 41S01-1306-TR-426, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Nov. 22, 2013).
“[W]hile a revocable trust is revocable, the trustee only owes a duty to the settlor.”