• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

In re I.P., No. 49S02-1402-JT-81, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 26, 2014)

March 27, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Parental rights should not be terminated when the magistrate who heard the case resigns before reporting recommended findings and conclusions because it violates the parent’s due process rights.

Delagrange v. State, No. 49S04-1304-CR-249, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Mar. 18, 2014).

March 20, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Evidence supported inference defendant had intent required for attempted child exploitation offense.

Corbally v. State, No. 41A04-1304-CR-175, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 19, 2014).

March 20, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Testimony by police investigator of victim’s statement to investigator was inadmissible hearsay, and while defendant withdrew his hearsay objection he did not waive the objection under the circumstances

Moss v. State, No. 49A02-1307-CR-618, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 20, 2014).

March 20, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

When defendant had his prior felony conviction reduced to a misdemeanor, after he was charged in this case with C felony handgun without a license based on the prior felony, his motion to dismiss the C felony should have been granted even though he had the prior felony conviction when the handgun offense was committed.

In re G.P., No. 49S02-1308-JT-558, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 13, 2014).

March 20, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

A trial court does not have discretion to appoint an attorney to a parent under Ind. Code § 31-34-4-6; Ind. Code § 31-32-4-3 does give the court discretion to appoint an attorney for a parent who fails to meet the statutory requirements for being indigent but for whom appointed counsel might still be appropriate.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 379
  • Go to page 380
  • Go to page 381
  • Go to page 382
  • Go to page 383
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs