• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Tin Thang v. State, No. 49S04-1402-CR-72, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 27, 2014).

July 3, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, S. David, Supreme

Distinguishing caselaw holding that, for the OWI offense, endangerment cannot be inferred from intoxication alone, affirms public intoxication conviction on basis defendant’s presence while intoxicated with a car at a gas station supported an inference he operated the vehicle while intoxicated and thus committed the public intoxication element of endangering himself or others.

Gaddie v. State, No. 49S02-1312-CR-789, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 27, 2014).

July 3, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

“To avoid conflict with the Fourth Amendment . . . the statute defining the offense of Resisting Law Enforcement by fleeing after being ordered to stop must be construed to require that a law enforcement officer’s order to stop be based on reasonable suspicion or probable cause.”

South Shore Baseball, LLC v. DeJesus, No. 45S03-1308-CT-531, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 27, 2014).

July 3, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Stadiums and franchises have no special limited duty beyond the principles of premises liability.

Powell v. Powell, No. 88A01-1402-PL-59, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 3, 2014).

July 3, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

“[W]hen property is conveyed to individuals by the entirety or entireties, regardless of whether those individuals are husband and wife, a presumption arises that the grantor intended to convey the property with the right of survivorship.”

Riley v. California, Nos. 13–132 and 13–212, __ U.S. __ (June 25, 2014).

June 26, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: J. Roberts, SCOTUS

“Our answer to the question of what police must do before searching a cell phone seized incident to an arrest is accordingly simple— get a warrant.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 367
  • Go to page 368
  • Go to page 369
  • Go to page 370
  • Go to page 371
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs