• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Pohl v. Pohl, No. 32S04-1404-DR-245, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 9, 2014).

September 18, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

“[A]ny maintenance provision in a settlement agreement, regardless of its grounds, is modifiable only if the agreement so provides.”

Hughley v. State, No. 49S04-1406-MI-386, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 9, 2014).

September 18, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

A self-serving, but competent affidavit that contradicted the State’s designated evidence on a material fact was sufficient to preclude summary judgment.

Cross v. State, No. 73S01-1401-CR-29, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 3, 2014).

September 5, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Firearm sentence enhancement and handgun without a permit conviction were based on the same behavior in violation of Indiana common law rule supplementing Indiana Double Jeopardy protection.

Hall v. State, No. 49A05-1312-CR-614, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 4, 2014).

September 5, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam, N. Vaidik

Trial court erred in excluding phone call transcript containing information about alleged molesting victim’s apparent false accusation of nonconsensual sex with another individual; also holds trial court erred in not compelling a party to the phone call to answer deposition questions about the call.

Gyamfi v. State, No. 30A01-1311-CR-487, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 4, 2014).

September 5, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, P. Riley

Applies prior holding that the “attenuation doctrine” of Fourth Amendment law does not apply under the Indiana Constitution; majority opinion concludes that the Fourth Amendment inevitable discovery doctrine does not apply under the Indiana Constitution, but concurring panel members conclude instead that inevitable discovery could apply under the Indiana Constitution but that the State failed to show an inevitable discovery.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 360
  • Go to page 361
  • Go to page 362
  • Go to page 363
  • Go to page 364
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs