• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

In re Paternity of Pickett, No. 29A02-1501-JP-9, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App, Sept. 23, 2015).

September 28, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Trial court erred in ordering father to contribute to child’s college expenses based on the cost of a private university rather than a public university; the private university did not offer a special curriculum and child did not discuss her decisionmaking process with her father.

Boyer Construction Group Corp. v. Walker Construction Co., Inc., No. 45A03-1502-PL-66, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App, Sept. 24, 2015).

September 28, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Even after a trial court has entered a judgment, parties can still make a new filing for attorney fees.

Strunk v. State, No. 47A01-1411-CR-487, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 15, 2015).

September 21, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Minor sex-abuse victim properly authenticated Facebook message from defendant to her; she was familiar with appearance of defendant’s Facebook page and had previously communicated with him through Facebook messages.

Bradley v. State, No. 49A05-1404-CR-181, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 16, 2015).

September 21, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Warrantless entry of home was proper under federal and state constitutions, because occupant who answered the door had apparent authority to consent to the entry. Protective sweep of kitchen after consensual entry was proper under federal and state constitutions (declining to follow Cudworth v. State, 818 N.E.2d 133 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004)). Convictions for both A-felony cocaine dealing and C-felony possessing cocaine and a firearm violated double jeopardy, because charging information did not differentiate between sources of cocaine: small quantity found in home, or large quantity found in defendant’s pocket.

Layman v. State, No. 20S04-1509-CR-548, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., Sept. 18, 2015).

September 21, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Evidence was insufficient to convict defendants of felony murder in the course of burglarizing a home they thought was unoccupied; none were armed or engaged in any “dangerously violent or threatening conduct” that was “clearly the mediate or immediate cause” of their co-perpetrator’s death.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 306
  • Go to page 307
  • Go to page 308
  • Go to page 309
  • Go to page 310
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs