• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Marshall v. State, No. 20A03-1507-MI-973, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 9, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Barnes

Expungement was properly denied when, despite having no new convictions, petitioner had admitted in a pretrial diversion program to committing a new crime.

Lowden v. State, No. 49A02-1503-CR-170, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 10, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

For purposes of aggravated battery, “substantial risk of death or … protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member or organ” is not a material element of the offense, but rather a result to which mens rea is inapplicable.

Williams v. State, No. 29A02-1506-CR-528, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 10, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

Defendant entered an “open plea,” despite plea agreement’s mistaken recitation that it was not, because trial court retained discretion over placement of the sentence. Defendant therefore did not waive right to appeal sentence.

Parkview Hospital v. Frost, No. 02A03-1507-PL-959, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 14, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: E. Friedlander, E. Najam

Evidence of discounts provided to patients who either have private health insurance or are covered by government healthcare reimbursement programs is relevant, admissible evidence regarding the determination of reasonable charges under the Indiana Hospital Lien Act.

Blaize v. State, No. 26S00-1410-LW-771, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., March 1, 2016).

March 7, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Trial judge’s comments to jury, though perhaps ill-advised, did not vouch for the credibility of the State’s cell-phone tower evidence and undermine Defendant’s alibi defense.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 292
  • Go to page 293
  • Go to page 294
  • Go to page 295
  • Go to page 296
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 596
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs