Consecutive sentences for two counts of SVF in possession of a firearm did not constitute a double enhancement,; but they exceeded the statutory cap for a “single episode of criminal conduct.”
Ackerman v. State, No. 49S00-1409-CR-770, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., Apr. 5, 2016).
Under the particular circumstances, autopsy report was not prepared for “primary purpose” of future investigation or prosecution, and therefore was not testimonial hearsay.
Ammons v. State, No. 45S03-1604-CR-167, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., Apr. 5, 2016).
Requiring an Indiana resident, who recently moved to Indiana from another state, to register as a sex offender is not an ex post facto violation when offender was already required to register in another jurisdiction.
City of Beech Grove v. Beloat, No. 49S02-1604-CT-165, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 5, 2016).
“City failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that the challenged act or omission was a policy decision made by consciously balancing risks and benefits. Thus, the City was not entitled to summary judgment on the question of discretionary function immunity under the [Indiana Tort Claims Act].”
Community Health Network v. Bails, No. 49A05-1512-PL-2059, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 7, 2016).
Absent fraud, an agreed judgment is not appealable.