• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Johnson v. State, 71A04-1605-CR-1042, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 16, 2016).

September 19, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Driver of car constructively possessed heroin when the driver made furtive gestures when pulled over, the heroin was in close proximity to the driver, and the nature of the space demonstrated that he knew of the nature and presence of the heroin.

Meridian Health Services v. Bell, No. 71A04-1511-DR-2005, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 14, 2016).

September 19, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Health care provider was required to release a child’s mental health care records to the child’s father; trial court properly held the health care provider in contempt for not providing the records to father.

Love v. State, No. 71A03-1511-CR-2009, __N.E.3d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 8, 2016).

September 12, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown, R. Pyle

Deference will be given to the trial court’s factual determinations unless police video recording indisputably contradicts those findings.

In re J.B., No. 48S02-1604-MI-183, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 8, 2016).

September 12, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

On rehearing, reverses that part of the CHINS court’s order that discharged the parties and terminated the CHINS case and remands this case for further proceedings consistent with the CHINS statutes, including any appropriate services for Mother.

White v. Canal Ins. Co., No. 71A03-1602-CT-270, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 8, 2016).

September 12, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

As a matter of law, service on out-of-state defendant at the home address provided to the police at the time of the time of the accident and service on the defendant company through the Indiana Secretary of State was consistent with due process and reasonably calculated to inform the defendants that an action had been instituted against them.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 258
  • Go to page 259
  • Go to page 260
  • Go to page 261
  • Go to page 262
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs