• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Wells v. Wells, No. 23A-DR-990, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 12, 2024).

March 18, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas, P. Foley

Even though father agreed to pay for daughter’s college education in the marital settlement agreement, daughter could repudiate their relationship and relieve father of his duty to pay.

A.W. v. State, No. 23S-JV-40, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 12, 2024).

March 18, 2024 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: C. Goff, M. Massa, Supreme

Under the second step of the double jeopardy test announced in the Indiana Supreme Court’s Wadle opinion, when assessing whether an offense is factually included, a court may examine only the facts as presented on the face of the charging instrument. Moreover, where ambiguities exist in a charging instrument about whether one offense is factually included in another, courts must construe those ambiguities in the defendant’s favor, and thus find a presumptive double jeopardy violation. In this event, the State can later rebut this presumption at the third step of the Wadle test.

Morales v. Rust, No. 23S-PL-371, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 6, 2024).

March 11, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, D. Molter, M. Massa

The Affiliation Statute, the statute that contains objective criteria for determining eligibility to appear on the primary ballot of a major political party and discretion for a party to allow the candidacy regardless of compliance, is constitutional.

C.M. v. Y.N., No. 23A-AD-1590 __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 6, 2024).

March 11, 2024 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

To comply with Ind. Code § 31-19-5-12(a) and to be entitled to notice of an adoption, a putative father must register with the Putative Father Registry not later than thirty days after the child is born or not later than the date of the filing of the adoption petition, whichever date occurs later.

Goalsetter Systems, Inc. v. Estate of Gerwels, No. 23A-CT-1896, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 28, 2024).

March 4, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Materials withheld in a FOIA request are not privileged and non-discoverable because of a federal interest.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 24
  • Go to page 25
  • Go to page 26
  • Go to page 27
  • Go to page 28
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 589
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs