• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Baker v. State, No. 49A02-1605-CR-1154, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 25, 2017).

January 31, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, R. Altice

When restitution is ordered as a condition of probation, the trial court must inquire as to defendant’s ability to pay, and if ordered to pay for property damages of the victim, it must be based on the actual cost of repair or replacement.

Ellis v. State, No. 71S05-1606-PC-360, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 26, 2017).

January 31, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

A judge may not accept a plea of guilty when the defendant both pleads guilty and maintains his innocence at the same time.

Shepard v. State, No. 84A01-1606-CR-1309, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 30, 2017).

January 31, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

Community corrections programs may be managed by counties as well as the Department of Correction, and the trial court properly adopted the program’s disciplinary decision to revoke defendant’s good time credit in the sentencing order.

Garner v. Kempf, No. 82A01-1512-PL-2362, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 30, 2017).

January 31, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Altice, R. Pyle

Clerk, a garnishee defendant, is liable when she received a motion for proceedings supplemental to garnish the bond in an unrelated criminal case, and the clerk did not provide notice of the lien in the criminal case.

S.S. v. State, No. 49A05-1605-JV-1070, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 17, 2017).

January 23, 2017 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Even though juvenile defendant agreed to make restitution as part of the admission agreement, the juvenile court abused its discretion when it ordered him to pay restitution after it determined he did not have the ability to pay.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 246
  • Go to page 247
  • Go to page 248
  • Go to page 249
  • Go to page 250
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 587
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs