Fleeing in a vehicle and then on foot constitute one continuous act of resisting law enforcement, which cannot result in a conviction of two separate crimes.
Scott v. Carrico, No. 59A01-1712-CT-2878, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 16, 2018).
Tort claims related to an estate can be brought in civil court, if the claims at issue were not known until after the probate court statute of limitations has passed.
Haddock v. State, No. 18A-CR-1362, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 29, 2018).
A defendant’s waiver of appellate rights is only valid if the sentence is imposed in accordance with the law; however, if a sentence imposed is illegal, and the defendant does not specifically agree to the sentence, the waiver-of-appeal provision is invalid.
Bradley v. State, No. 87A01-1711-CR-2584, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 30, 2018).
Defendant’s convictions for two counts of child molesting were affirmed; however, his other conviction for child molesting and conviction for incest were reversed since it is reasonably possible that the jury found him guilty on those counts for the very same acts that were the bases of his convictions for counts one and two.
Brooks v. State, No. 18A-CR-759, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2018).
While defendant showed obnoxious disrespect for authority, her conviction for resisting law enforcement was reversed because strong, powerful, violent means were not shown to be used to evade a law enforcement official’s rightful exercise of his duties.