• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Byers v. State, No. 19A-CR-246, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 24, 2019

October 28, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

A four-day period between the illegal activity and the finding of probable cause does not render a warrant constitutionally stale.

Ind. Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Douglass, No. 19A-MI-216, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 23, 2019).

October 28, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

BMV had the right to pursue a suspension of defendant’s driving privileges in Indiana even though he was a no longer a resident of Indiana.

Schuler v. State, No. 31S00-1703-LW-134, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 18, 2019).

October 21, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Because the trial court’s revised sentencing order demonstrated that it did not rely on non-statutory aggravating circumstances in imposing life without parole, the order was not improper.

McAnalley v. State, No. 18A-CR-1099, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 18, 2019).

October 21, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, C. Darden

Defendant is permitted to stipulate to his status as a felon in a trial for unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon. When a passenger in an automobile is arrested on a warrant, search of the passenger compartment is permissible under both the Indiana and federal constitutions, based on suspicious behavior and/or admission by the passenger of ownership of contraband in the passenger side of the vehicle.

Weikart v. Whitko Comm. School Corp., No. 19A-CT-1224, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 17, 2019).

October 21, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, T. Crone

Trial court properly dismissed case for failure to state a claim; police officer did not have a special duty to plaintiff to protect her activities from public disclosure.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 150
  • Go to page 151
  • Go to page 152
  • Go to page 153
  • Go to page 154
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 596
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs