Trial court properly dismissed case for failure to state a claim; police officer did not have a special duty to plaintiff to protect her activities from public disclosure.
Falls v. State, No. 19S-CR-557, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 8, 2019).
A charge of stalking may be supported by conduct that is continuous in nature, even if it is a single episode.
State v. McFarland, No. 18A-CR-2408, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 10, 2019
Trial court properly denied the State’s motion to amend the habitual offender charging information because it would prejudice defendant’s substantial rights and because it was not supported by good cause.
Martin v. State, No. 19A-CR-183, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 11, 2019).
Defendant was improperly sentenced for a crime – Level 3 Felony robbery – for which he had not been convicted because the State did not allege the use of a deadly weapon as an enhancement of the robbery offense, and the jury was never instructed on that crime.
Battering v. State, No. 18A-CR-2309, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 11, 2019).
The defendant was not entitled to discharge under Criminal Rule 4(C) as trial-court proceedings were “stayed” when the trial court authorized an interlocutory appeal by the State and vacated the upcoming trial date, but did not actually use the word “stay.”