• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Wilder v. DeGood Dimensional Concepts, Inc., No. 20A-PL-1100__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App, Feb. 16, 2021).

February 22, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

While a trial court can take judicial notice of reasonable attorney’s fees in routine cases involving relatively small amounts, the trial court abused its discretion when it awarded appellate attorney’s fees in a reduced hourly amount with no evidence to support the reduced rate.

Brown v. State, 19A-MI-1999, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 10, 2021).

February 15, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Amendment of Ind. Code § 35-33-5-7 to include subsection (f) was a remedial measure intended to clarify that a search warrant is considered “executed” for purposes of Ind. Code § 35-33-5-7 when officers seize the items described in the search warrant.

Abbott v. State, 19A-PL-1635, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 15, 2021).

February 15, 2021 Filed Under: Civil, Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, N. Vaidik

In a civil forfeiture action, the res may be used for defense related expenses.

DeWees v. State, 20A-CR-1146, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 15, 2021).

February 15, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

Indiana Criminal Rule 26 warrants that, where a qualifying arrestee does not present a substantial risk of flight or danger to self or others, a trial court should release the arrestee without money bail or surety subject to such restrictions and conditions as determined by the court. Moreover, our Indiana Code provides that, in setting the amount of bail or deciding whether to grant conditional pre-trial release, trial courts must consider all facts relevant to the risk of a defendant’s failure to appear, including factors enumerated in Indiana Code Section 35-33-8-4(b).

Cooper’s Hawk Indianapolis, LLC v. Ray, No. 21S-CT-56, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 9, 2021).

February 15, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

A belated notice of appeal needs to do more than restate the grounds for granting a discretionary appeal; an extraordinary compelling reason to restore the forfeited appeal must be stated.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 99
  • Go to page 100
  • Go to page 101
  • Go to page 102
  • Go to page 103
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 586
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs