• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Juvenile

R.W. v. State, No. 49A02-1112-JV-1187, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 25, 2012).

October 1, 2012 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Mother’s failure to sign on the waiver line of the juvenile waiver of rights form, when the form was the only evidence in the record of a purported waiver, required exclusion of the juvenile’s subsequent statement to the police. The juvenile court found that the alleged criminal mischief delinquent act had been proven but merged the mischief into the burglary act by entering a “not true” finding on the mischief; opinion vacates burglary delinquency due to the waiver form problem and remands to have a “true finding” entered on the criminal mischief count.

T.B. v. Ind. Dept. of Child Svcs., No. 79A04-1110-JT-594, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 29, 2012).

July 5, 2012 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

The Court declined to adopt a policy that prohibits the involuntary termination of parental rights for all mentally retarded parents.

In re Paternity of S.C., No. 30A01-1107-JP-322, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 29, 2012).

March 30, 2012 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander, P. Riley

The trial court properly vacated a paternity order issued under a fraudulent pretext.

In re K.D., No. 49S02-1107-JC-41, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., March 13, 2012).

March 15, 2012 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

“Whenever a trial court is confronted with one parent wishing to make an admission that the child is in need of services and the other parent wishing to deny the same, the trial court shall conduct a fact-finding hearing as to the entire matter.”

A.A.Q. v. State, No. 71A03-1105-JV-239, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 6, 2011).

December 8, 2011 Filed Under: Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Consultation by alleged delinquent and parents with public defender prior to initial hearing supports conclusion the waiver of counsel at that hearing was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 18
  • Go to page 19
  • Go to page 20
  • Go to page 21
  • Go to page 22
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 25
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs