• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Brooks v. State, No. 18A-CR-759, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

While defendant showed obnoxious disrespect for authority, her conviction for resisting law enforcement was reversed because strong, powerful, violent means were not shown to be used to evade a law enforcement official’s rightful exercise of his duties.

Granger v. State, No. 18A-CR-1494, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Marijuana grinder is not drug paraphernalia. Paraphernalia is defined as an instrument or device that is used to put or insert a controlled substance into the body and a grinder can only be used to prepare marijuana for ingestion by another means, such as by a joint, a pipe, or a bong.

Weisheit v. State, No. 10S00-1507-PD-413, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 7, 2018).

November 13, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: G. Slaughter, L. Rush, S. David, Supreme

Defendant’s conviction of the murders of two children, arson, death penalty sentence affirmed; finding that although mistakes were made by trial and appellate counsel most of them did not rise to the level of deficient performance under the Strickland decision, and defendant in any case failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced.

Bradtmiller v. State, No. 18A-CR-884, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 17, 2018).

October 22, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Although defendant properly waived his right to a jury trial on the underlying charges, he did not waive his right to a jury trial on the habitual-offender enhancement because he did not personally communicate to the judge a desire to waive that right.

DeCola v. State, No. 18A-MI-732, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 17, 2018).

October 22, 2018 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Petitioners seeking expungement are not entitled to a jury trial. The Indiana Code does not allow for an individual to have a school suspension expunged from his records; expungement is a remedy limited to criminal arrests and convictions.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 90
  • Go to page 91
  • Go to page 92
  • Go to page 93
  • Go to page 94
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 325
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs