Defendant does not have a constitutional right to possess marijuana and Ind. Code § 35-48-4-11 does not violate Article 1, Section 1, of the Indiana Constitution as applied to him.
Criminal
Keene v. State, No. 18A-XP-228, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 23, 2019).
Expungement petitioners do not have the right to cross-examine victims who provide victim statements.
Dunham v. State, No. 18A-IF-1442, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 15, 2019).
Equipment that had just been used to perform farm drainage work and was being transported back to the office was exempt from the weight limit for heavy equipment on state highways.
Tuell v. State, No. 18A-CR-1186, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 15, 2019).
The current version of the habitual offender statute allows a court to use that enhancement to a conviction of operating a motor vehicle after forfeiture for life even though that is a progressive penalty.
J.W. v. State, No. 19S-JV-12, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 9, 2019).
A juvenile who challenges the validity of a consent judgment must first seek relief from the trial court under Trial Rule 60(B) and is entitled to legal representation in doing so.