Defendant’s online Facebook postings were not constitutionally protected since they were proscribable speech as a threat to peace, safety, and well-being.
Criminal
Brown v. State, No. 18A-PC-3128, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 21, 2019).
A post-conviction court may summarily deny a petition for PCR if the petitioner is entitled to no relief as a matter of law.
Walmsley v. State, No. 18A-CR-2506, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 29, 2019).
A felony-murder charge of delivery of a narcotic drug resulting in death does not apply when two or more people jointly acquired and possessed the drug.
Wilcoxson v. State, No. 18A-CR-1882, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 29, 2019).
Defendant may be charged with two counts of attempted murder when he fired shots in the direction of two different officers, and double jeopardy doesn’t apply under either the continuous-crime doctrine or the very same act test.
Shaw v. State, No. 19S-PC-466, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 21, 2019).
A second or successive post-conviction petition is subject to the screening procedure outlined in P-C. R. 1(12) and must have appellate court authorization to proceed; however, a post-conviction petition that raises only issues emerging from a new trial, new sentencing, or new appeal obtained from a federal court through habeas proceedings is not a “second” or “successive” petition and does not require prior authorization.