• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Brown v. State, 19A-MI-1999, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 10, 2021).

February 15, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Amendment of Ind. Code § 35-33-5-7 to include subsection (f) was a remedial measure intended to clarify that a search warrant is considered “executed” for purposes of Ind. Code § 35-33-5-7 when officers seize the items described in the search warrant.

Abbott v. State, 19A-PL-1635, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 15, 2021).

February 15, 2021 Filed Under: Civil, Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey, N. Vaidik

In a civil forfeiture action, the res may be used for defense related expenses.

DeWees v. State, 20A-CR-1146, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 15, 2021).

February 15, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

Indiana Criminal Rule 26 warrants that, where a qualifying arrestee does not present a substantial risk of flight or danger to self or others, a trial court should release the arrestee without money bail or surety subject to such restrictions and conditions as determined by the court. Moreover, our Indiana Code provides that, in setting the amount of bail or deciding whether to grant conditional pre-trial release, trial courts must consider all facts relevant to the risk of a defendant’s failure to appear, including factors enumerated in Indiana Code Section 35-33-8-4(b).

Anderson v. State, 21S-CR-28, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 26, 2021).

February 1, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Before counsel’s appointment, a trial court must consider a defendant’s pro se motion, like a request for an early trial. After counsel’s appointment, this consideration is left to the trial court’s discretion

Fields v. State, 20A-CR-1799, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 26, 2021).

February 1, 2021 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Notwithstanding a waiver of appeal provision in a plea agreement, a defendant who was sentenced contrary to law is an eligible defendant permitted to seek a belated appeal pursuant to Post-Conviction Rule 2.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 44
  • Go to page 45
  • Go to page 46
  • Go to page 47
  • Go to page 48
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 324
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs