• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Barber v. State, No. 49A02-0901-CR-34, __ N.E.2d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 17, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

When there was no evidence defense discovery of exculpatory witnesses the weekend before trial was in bad faith, and prejudice to State from a continuance was minimal, trial court reversibly erred in denying a continuance and applying instead a hard deadline for the witness list to exclude the witnesses.

Lang v. State, No. 67A01-0905-CR-241, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 17, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Under notice-based approach, entry of final judgment, from which time period to file notice of appeal began to run, was not when sentence was announced in court or when posted to the RJO but rather when the judge signed the sentencing order.

Collins v. State, No. 35A02-0902-CR-162 , __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 21, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Probation modification statute permitted addition of special probation conditions without proof of a violation, and as statute is remedial it applied to probation imposed before its adoption.

Alvey v. State, No. 82S01-0902-CR-66, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Aug. 24, 2009)

August 28, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme, T. Boehm

A defendant whose motion to suppress is denied cannot plead guilty and then appeal the denial of his motion, even if his plea agreement provides for it.

Kimbrough v. State, No. 20A03-0901-CR-29, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 13, 2009)

August 14, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Determinations of defendant’s ability to pay fines, court costs, and public defender fund reimbursement were not required at sentencing when the payments were deferred until post-sentence events. When victim had obtained a civil judgment against defendant prior to sentencing, trial court might have to adjust restitution order to avoid double recovery for victim.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 307
  • Go to page 308
  • Go to page 309
  • Go to page 310
  • Go to page 311
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 324
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs