Proper showing was made for probation revocation evidence of alcohol use generated by Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (“SCRAM”) bracelet.
Criminal
Hevner v. State, No. 27S02-1001-CR-5, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Jan. 6, 2010)
Indiana Constitution’s ex post facto clause precludes application of a sex offender registration requirement enacted after the offense was committed.
Outlaw v. State, No. 49A02-0904-CR-340, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 18, 2009)
Evidence that defendant was intoxicated, without more, does not suffice to prove the “endangerment” element of A misdemeanor operating while intoxicated.
Vanderlinden v. State, No. 49A02-0905-CR-417, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 18, 2009)
Evidence defendant was speeding sufficed to prove the “endangerment” element of Class A misdemeanor operating while intoxicated.
Robinson v. State, No. 20A04-0909-CR-530, __ N.E.2D __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 29, 2009)
Sheriff’s failure to transport defendant from correctional facility for initial hearing did not stop the running of the 70 day period for defendant’s Criminal Rule 4(B) speedy trial.