• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Cottingham v. State, No. 06A01-1008-CR-431, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 19, 2011).

July 22, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

2010 amendment of I.C. 35-38-2.6-6 providing for “credit time” for community corrections home detention is ameliorative and required credit for home detention served prior to the amendment when probation was revoked after effective date.

Sharp . State, No. 12A02-1010-CR-1188, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 19, 2011).

July 22, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Defendant’s convictions for Class A child molesting and Class C child molesting, alleged to have occurred during the same 13 month period, did not violate Indiana double jeopardy under the “actual evidence test.”

Berry v. State, No. 49A04-1008-CR-536, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 20, 2011).

July 22, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Reverses bench trial conviction and acquits defendant on the basis of caselaw “fixed insanity” doctrine that a “defendant who manifests a mental disease or defect, as opposed to intoxication, caused by prolonged and chronic alcohol abuse that renders him or her unable to distinguish right from wrong is not responsible for a crime committed while in that condition.”

Carpenter v. State, No. 49S02-1104-CR-198, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., July 21, 2011)

July 22, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, R. Shepard, Supreme

“A complete review of Carpenter’s criminal history reveals that—although ample in number and clearly a recidivist—his crimes are of the type where a forty-year sentence is inappropriate.”

Bellamy v. State, No. 49A02-1011-CR-1214, __ N. E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 21, 2011).

July 22, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

When defendant had been warned he would be held in contempt if he failed to promptly appear for future scheduled proceedings, his appearance almost an hour late for his trial was properly punished summarily as direct criminal contempt.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 265
  • Go to page 266
  • Go to page 267
  • Go to page 268
  • Go to page 269
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 325
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs