Sex offender registration relief statute confers discretion on court to deny relief even though the court finds the petitioner has made the showings required by the remedy statute to qualify for relief or, in the absence of findings, even though the evidence in the record would support a decision the petitioner made the required showings.
Criminal
Coleman v. State, No. 49A02-1101-CR-12, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 26, 2011).
For purpose of the consecutive sentencing statute, a conspiracy to commit a “crime of violence” is not itself a “crime of violence.”
Henderson v. State, No. 20A03-1102-PC-108, __N.E.2d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 29, 2011).
U.S. Supreme Court’s Gant, which did away with “brightline” rule allowing searches of passenger compartments at the time the driver was arrested even if driver was no longer within reaching distance of the vehicle, does not apply to a pre-Gant “brightline” search legal when made under the Court’s former New York v. Belton precedent.
Alter v. State, No. 85A04-1101-CR-44, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 31, 2011).
After conservation officer had been shown subject’s fishing license, further detention for questions based on officer’s hunch subject might have put marijuana in his duffle was unsupported by reasonable suspicion and required suppression of marijuana subject produced on officer’s command to “give me your marijuana.”
Feuston v. State, No. 38A02-1011-CR-1175, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 19, 2011).
Trial court has no duty to set a trial date when defendant absconds and fails to appear; Criminal Rule 4(C) one year did not begin to run until defendant’s notice of his incarceration in another county and request for trial were received by the trial court and the prosecutor; fact jail may have known of defendant’s presence in the other county was not attributable to court and prosecutor in this case.