• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Clark v. State, No. 48A04-1104-CR-249, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 5, 2011).

December 8, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

When probation is transferred to another county, the forty-five day filing deadline for a revocation in I.C. 35-38-2-3(a)(2)(B) begins when the receiving court with supervisory authority has notice of the violation, and not when the sentencing court first learns of the violation.

Jones v. State, No. 34A05-1101-CR-66, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 5, 2011).

December 8, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Police substantially complied with statute on destruction of hazardous chemicals so that photographs and other evidence of the chemicals was properly admitted at trial.

Trujillo v. State, No. 71A03-1102-PC-73, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 28, 2011).

December 2, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Defendant who was 52, lived with his mother, and presented no evidence of any spouse or children in the United States failed to establish the ineffective assistance harm element by showing “special circumstances” to support his contention he would not have pled guilty had defense counsel properly advised him of the immigration consequences of his guilty plea.

Hopper v. State, No. 13S01-1007-PC-399, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Nov. 29, 2011).

December 2, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, R. Shepard, Supreme

On rehearing, decides not to adopt original opinion’s supervisory waiver-of-counsel rule requiring advice of an attorney’s ability to negotiate with the State.

Jewell v. State, No. 32S04-1104-CR-200, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 30, 2011).

December 2, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme

When a defendant is represented by counsel for one offense, the Indiana Constitution permits police to question the defendant about other offenses without counsel present if the other offenses are not “inextricably intertwined” with the charged offense.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 256
  • Go to page 257
  • Go to page 258
  • Go to page 259
  • Go to page 260
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 325
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs